PERGESERAN PARADIGMA TATA KELOLA TI: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK DARI KEPATUHAN MENUJU KELINCAHAN DIGITAL LINTAS INDUSTRI
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Perkembangan transformasi digital telah mendorong perubahan paradigma dalam tata kelola teknologi informasi (IT Governance) dari pendekatan yang berorientasi pada kepatuhan dan pengendalian menuju tata kelola yang lebih adaptif, agile, dan mendukung inovasi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan perkembangan literatur ilmiah mengenai IT Governance dalam konteks transformasi digital menggunakan metode bibliometric analysis berbasis database Scopus periode 2021–2026. Proses analisis dilakukan melalui tahapan pencarian data, screening dokumen, serta visualisasi dan pemetaan ilmiah menggunakan Biblioshiny. Dataset akhir penelitian terdiri atas 421 artikel jurnal yang dianalisis untuk mengidentifikasi tren publikasi, kontribusi penulis, institusi, dan negara, serta struktur konseptual dan perkembangan tema penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa publikasi mengenai IT Governance mengalami peningkatan signifikan, khususnya pada periode 2024–2025. Tema penelitian juga mengalami pergeseran dari fokus kepatuhan, audit, dan kontrol menuju digital governance, digital transformation, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, dan e-government. Selain itu, Tiongkok menjadi negara dengan kontribusi publikasi dan sitasi tertinggi dalam domain penelitian ini. Temuan penelitian menegaskan bahwa tata kelola TI modern tidak lagi hanya berfungsi sebagai mekanisme kontrol, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen strategis untuk mendukung transformasi digital, inovasi organisasi, dan pengembangan kapabilitas digital secara berkelanjutan.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) STMIK TIMEReferensi
Facin, A. L. F., Barbosa, A. P. F. P. L., & Matsumoto, C. (2022). Featured topics in research on digital transformation: A bibliometric analysis and content analysis approach. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 62(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020220104
Pizzi, S., Venturelli, A., Variale, M., & Macario, G. P. (2021). Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 67, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
Ylinen, M. (2021). Incorporating agile practices in public sector IT management: A nudge toward adaptive governance. Information Polity, 26(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200269
Magnusson, J., Päivärinta, T., & Koutsikouri, D. (2021). Digital ambidexterity in the public sector: Empirical evidence of a bias in balancing practices. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2020-0028
Joshi, A., Benitez, J., Huygh, T., Ruiz, L., & De Haes, S. (2022). Impact of IT governance process capability on business performance: Theory and empirical evidence. Decision Support Systems, 153, 113668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113668
Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
G. M. W. Tangka, C. Lumingkewas, and E. Lompoliu, “IT governance maturity assessment at PT PLN Suluttengo using COBIT 2019,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2025, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i2.811.
A. Levstek, A. Pucihar, and T. Hovelja, “Towards an adaptive strategic IT governance model for SMEs,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 230–252, 2022, doi: 10.3390/jtaer17010012.
A. Chahid, S. Ahriz, K. El Guemmat, and K. Mansouri, “Developing digital capabilities through IT governance: A PLS-SEM analysis in Moroccan higher education institutions,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1543–1552, 2025, doi: 10.11591/eei.v14i2.8182.
R. Mulyana, L. Rusu, and E. Perjons, “Key ambidextrous IT governance mechanisms for successful digital transformation: A case study of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI),” Digital Business, vol. 4, p. 100083, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100083.
P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
S. De Haes and W. Van Grembergen, “An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment,” Information Systems Management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123–137, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10580530902794786.
G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
F. A. Almaqtari, “The role of IT governance in the integration of AI in accounting and auditing operations,” Economies, vol. 12, art. no. 199, 2024, doi: 10.3390/economies12080199.
J. Huang, Z. Shangguan, M. Y. Wang, and D. Xiao, “The impact of the digital economy on urban population crime rates: Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt,” SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 4, 2025.
J. Zheng, X. Zhang, and J. Wang, “The role of digital governance in fostering county-level digital entrepreneurial vitality: A quasi-experimental analysis of China’s information accessibility pilot,” Sustainability, vol. 17, art. no. 9096, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17209096.
N. Xu, W. Lv, and J. Wang, “The impact of digital transformation on firm performance: A perspective from enterprise risk management,” Eurasian Business Review, vol. 14, pp. 369–400, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40821-024-00264-9.
G. Cheng, “China’s Digital Silk Road in the age of the digital economy: Political analysis,” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 271–287, 2022, doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287.
S. Wang, Q. Li, and M. B. Khaskheli, “Management economic systems and governance to reduce potential risks in Digital Silk Road investments: Legal cooperation between Hainan Free Trade Port and Ethiopia,” Systems, vol. 12, art. no. 305, 2024, doi: 10.3390/systems12080305.
G. Kostka and A. Bogs, “The expanding digital reach of the Chinese state: Digital governance in China,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2026, doi: 10.1111/rego.70078.
A. Ilmudeen, “Information technology (IT) governance and IT capability to realize firm performance: Enabling role of agility and innovative capability,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1137–1161, 2022, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-02-2021-0069.
J. Zhen, Z. Xie, and K. Dong, “Impact of IT governance mechanisms on organizational agility and the role of top management support and IT ambidexterity,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 40, art. no. 100501, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100501.
C. L. Pedersen, “The IT buying center: Integrating the buying center and IT governance,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 110, pp. 46–55, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.02.007.
K. Jia and S. Chen, “Global digital governance: Paradigm shift and an analytical framework,” Global Public Policy and Governance, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 283–305, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43508-022-00047-w.
M. Hanisch, C. M. Goldsby, N. E. Fabian, and J. Oehmichen, “Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 162, art. no. 113777, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777.
V. A. Laptev and D. R. Feyzrakhmanova, “Digitalization of institutions of corporate law: Current trends and future prospects,” Laws, vol. 10, no. 4, art. no. 93, 2021, doi: 10.3390/laws10040093.
H. Ge and F. Wu, “Digital economy enables high-quality economic development: Theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence,” Frontiers of Economics in China, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 643–668, 2022.
T. T. L. Chong, S. Wang, and C. Zhang, “Understanding the digital economy in China: Characteristics, challenges, and prospects,” Economic and Political Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 419–440, 2023, doi: 10.1080/20954816.2023.2269327.
L. M. Pittenger, N. Berente, and J. Gaskin, “Transformational IT leaders and digital innovation: The moderating effect of formal IT governance,” ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 12–35, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3514097.3514104.
M. Queiroz, P. P. Tallon, and T. Coltman, “How do shared IT applications influence agility? Theory and evidence of a convex relationship,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1089–1115, 2022, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2022.2127452.
K. Tsilionis and Y. Wautelet, “A model-driven framework to support strategic agility: Value-added perspective,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 141, art. no. 106734, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106734.
W. Chuhao, K. Khan, and Z. Haiyuan, “Digital transformation of government: Sustainability through e-governance,” Public Money & Management, pp. 1–9, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2484795.
J. Roy, “Digital transformation versus Westminster traditionalism: Mindset, mechanisms and critical enablers of systemic adaptation,” Canadian Public Administration, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 481–494, 2024, doi: 10.1111/capa.12598.
X. Huang, Y. Hu, F. Zhang, and T. Li, “Government digital transformation for sustainable development: How e-government initiatives enhance total factor energy efficiency,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 80, art. no. 103084, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103084.
Z. Ma and F. Wu, “Smart city, digitalization and CO₂ emissions: Evidence from 353 cities in China,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, art. no. 225, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15010225.
S. A. A. Bokhari, S. Y. Park, and S. Manzoor, “Digital government transformation through artificial intelligence: The mediating role of stakeholder trust and participation,” Digital, vol. 5, no. 3, art. no. 43, 2025, doi: 10.3390/digital5030043.
H. Saragih, “The role of digital transformation in enhancing performance and security of technology infrastructure in public institutions,” Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.55214/25768484.v9i6.7865.
Z. Cao, Z. Lai, M. B. Khaskheli, and L. Wang, “The risk of global environmental change to economic sustainability and law: Help from digital technology and governance regulation,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 15, art. no. 7094, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17157094.
C. Puspitafuri, S. Zaid, H. T. Mokui, and D.-T. Saifuddin, “Dynamic capabilities, flexibility and competitive performance practices based on IT: Comparison of public organizations and agricultural businesses,” Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 367–376, 2025, doi: 10.22194/JGIAS/25.1584.
S. Matiash, I. Shevel, V. Bilan, R. Hromadskyi, and T. Yalokha, “Innovative approaches to the management of cultural institutions in the digital age,” International Journal of Culture and History Review, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.94.